<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Advent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adventip.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adventip.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>All Inventors! &#8211; The Race is About to Begin!  On Your Mark!  Get Set!  Go&#8230; &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.adventip.com/2011/09/all-inventors-the-race-is-about-to-begin-on-your-mark-get-set-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adventip.com/2011/09/all-inventors-the-race-is-about-to-begin-on-your-mark-get-set-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adventip.com/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By:  Ryan T. Grace[1]              Inventors &#8211; if you are not practicing your sprint drills…you should be.  General Counsel &#8211; if you are not exploring internal speed tactics for your research and development groups…you ought to.  General practice firms &#8211; &#8230; <a href="http://www.adventip.com/2011/09/all-inventors-the-race-is-about-to-begin-on-your-mark-get-set-go/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adventip.com/2011/09/all-inventors-the-race-is-about-to-begin-on-your-mark-get-set-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Circuit Decides That If Software Method Is Unpatentable, Then So Is The &#8220;Computer Readable Medium&#8221; Counterpart Claim</title>
		<link>http://www.adventip.com/2011/08/federal-circuit-decides-that-if-software-method-is-unpatentable-then-so-is-the-computer-readable-medium-counterpart-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adventip.com/2011/08/federal-circuit-decides-that-if-software-method-is-unpatentable-then-so-is-the-computer-readable-medium-counterpart-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adventip.com/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the recent CyberSource v. Retail Decisions case, the Federal Circuit held that if a software method claim is unpatentable, then the software claim re-written as a Beauregard claim (computer readable medium containing program instructions) is also unpatentable. The court &#8230; <a href="http://www.adventip.com/2011/08/federal-circuit-decides-that-if-software-method-is-unpatentable-then-so-is-the-computer-readable-medium-counterpart-claim/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adventip.com/2011/08/federal-circuit-decides-that-if-software-method-is-unpatentable-then-so-is-the-computer-readable-medium-counterpart-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BPAI Finds Patent Claims Directed to &#8220;An Array of Bits&#8221; An Abstract Idea</title>
		<link>http://www.adventip.com/2011/08/bpai-finds-patent-claims-directed-to-an-array-of-bits-an-abstract-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adventip.com/2011/08/bpai-finds-patent-claims-directed-to-an-array-of-bits-an-abstract-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adventip.com/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Ex Parte Shepard, the BPAI found claims directed to &#8220;an array of bits&#8221; an abstract idea. An exemplary claim recited in part: 10. An array of bits comprising: a first plurality of bits; and a second plurality of bits intersecting &#8230; <a href="http://www.adventip.com/2011/08/bpai-finds-patent-claims-directed-to-an-array-of-bits-an-abstract-idea/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adventip.com/2011/08/bpai-finds-patent-claims-directed-to-an-array-of-bits-an-abstract-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hangover 2&#8242;s Copyright Parody Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.adventip.com/2011/05/hangover-2s-copyright-parody-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adventip.com/2011/05/hangover-2s-copyright-parody-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 03:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adventip.com/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the more interesting intellectual property cases (and closely watched with the movie&#8217;s popularity) is the recent copyright infringement claim made against the studio releasing &#8220;The Hangover 2.&#8221;  In the last few weeks, the tattoo artist that designed Mike Tyson&#8217;s tattoo &#8230; <a href="http://www.adventip.com/2011/05/hangover-2s-copyright-parody-defense/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adventip.com/2011/05/hangover-2s-copyright-parody-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPTO Adds Prioritized Examination</title>
		<link>http://www.adventip.com/2011/03/uspto-adds-prioritized-examination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adventip.com/2011/03/uspto-adds-prioritized-examination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adventip.com/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently unveiled an  accelerated examination option for a $4,000 fee.  This option was announced the February 4, 2011 Federal Register.  The accelerated examination would allow for applications to be processed (e.g., receive an office &#8230; <a href="http://www.adventip.com/2011/03/uspto-adds-prioritized-examination/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adventip.com/2011/03/uspto-adds-prioritized-examination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BPAI Upholds Examiner&#8217;s Rejections of Claims Directed to A Computer-Implemented Method.</title>
		<link>http://www.adventip.com/2011/01/bpai-upholds-examiners-rejections-of-claims-directed-to-a-computer-implemented-method/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adventip.com/2011/01/bpai-upholds-examiners-rejections-of-claims-directed-to-a-computer-implemented-method/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Advent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adventip.com/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Ex parte Volcani et al., the BPAI upheld an examiner&#8217;s rejection that the claims were directed to non-statutory subject matter.  The appellants&#8217; disclosure is directed to determining the emotional impact of words upon a reader where values may be assigned to &#8230; <a href="http://www.adventip.com/2011/01/bpai-upholds-examiners-rejections-of-claims-directed-to-a-computer-implemented-method/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adventip.com/2011/01/bpai-upholds-examiners-rejections-of-claims-directed-to-a-computer-implemented-method/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

